You’ve made the leap, investing in high-efficiency Heterojunction (HJT) cells to push your solar module performance to the next level. The datasheets promise impressive power output, but on the production line, the results are often inconsistent. Some modules are flawless, while others show unexpected power degradation after lamination.
The culprit might not be a major equipment failure or a bad batch of materials. More likely, it’s hiding in a process window just 15 degrees Celsius wide: the peak reflow temperature for soldering your cell ribbons. For thermally sensitive HJT cells, this single parameter is a delicate balance between creating a robust electrical connection and inflicting invisible, irreversible damage.
What Makes HJT Cells Different (and So Thermally Sensitive)?
Before we dive into the data, it helps to understand why HJT cells require such special treatment. Unlike traditional PERC cells, an HJT cell features a crystalline silicon wafer sandwiched between ultra-thin layers of amorphous silicon. These layers are the key to their high efficiency and excellent performance in low-light conditions.
However, this innovative structure is also a critical vulnerability. The amorphous silicon layers are extremely sensitive to heat. If exposed to temperatures above 200°C, even briefly, they can begin to degrade, compromising the very properties that make them so powerful. This thermal sensitivity is a world away from the more forgiving nature of standard PERC cells, and it forces us to rethink a fundamental process: soldering.
The Core Conflict: Joint Strength vs. Thermal Stress
When soldering ribbons to a 16BB HJT cell, every process engineer faces a classic trade-off:
-
Maximize Solder Joint Strength: To ensure a module lasts for 25+ years in the field, you need a strong, reliable connection between the copper ribbon and the cell’s busbars. This requires enough thermal energy for the low-temperature solder paste to reflow correctly, forming a solid intermetallic bond. A weak joint leads to high resistance, power loss, and potential failure.
-
Minimize Thermal Stress on the Cell: At the same time, you must protect the delicate HJT cell from heat-induced damage. Too much heat can cause the cell to warp or, worse, develop microcracks. These tiny fractures are often invisible to the naked eye but can propagate over time, leading to significant power loss and module failure.
Navigating this conflict is impossible without precise data. Guesswork and „tribal knowledge“ from PERC lines won’t cut it. You need a validated process window.
Finding the Sweet Spot: A Data-Driven Analysis
To define this critical process window, we ran a series of controlled experiments at PVTestLab. Our goal was to map the direct relationship between peak reflow temperature, ribbon pull-strength, and cell integrity for 16BB HJT cells using a common low-temperature solder paste. The results were illuminating.
The Quest for Mechanical Strength: Pull-Strength Data
First, we needed to understand how temperature affects the mechanical bond. We used a pull-tester to measure the force (in Newtons) required to peel the soldered ribbon off the cell. This is a direct indicator of joint quality.
Our tests revealed a clear, dramatic trend. Below 160°C, the solder paste failed to fully melt and wet the surfaces, resulting in weak, inconsistent bonds—a major reliability risk.
As we increased the temperature, pull-strength climbed sharply, peaking in the narrow range of 165°C to 170°C. In this sweet spot, the solder achieved an ideal bond with both the cell and the ribbon.
Counterintuitively, going above 175°C actually caused the pull-strength to decrease. This wasn’t because the solder itself was failing; it was a warning sign that the cell’s underlying structure was weakening from thermal stress, shifting the failure point from the solder to the cell itself.
The Hidden Danger: Detecting Thermal Stress with Electroluminescence (EL)
But a strong solder joint is meaningless if the cell itself is damaged. This is where Electroluminescence (EL) testing comes in. Think of it as an X-ray for solar cells, revealing defects like microcracks that are otherwise invisible.
The EL results told the other half of the story. Cells processed at a peak temperature of 165°C were pristine, with no signs of thermal stress. Yet the moment we pushed the temperature to 180°C, the EL images revealed a network of microcracks forming along the busbars.
These microcracks are ticking time bombs. A module might pass an initial flash test, but once out in the field experiencing daily thermal cycles, these cracks can grow, severing electrical connections and killing performance. This kind of detailed analysis is central to our process optimization services, where we help manufacturers avoid these costly hidden defects.
The Verdict: A Validated Process Window for 16BB HJT Cells
By combining the pull-strength and EL data, the optimal process window becomes crystal clear.
- Below 165°C: You risk poor solder wetting and weak joints, leading to long-term reliability issues.
- 165°C to 170°C: This is the validated sweet spot. You achieve maximum mechanical bond strength without inducing harmful thermal stress in the cell.
- Above 170°C: You enter the danger zone. The risk of creating performance-killing microcracks increases dramatically with every degree.
Of course, factors like your specific solder paste, ribbon coating, and soldering equipment can shift this window slightly. This is why for companies developing new modules, validating these parameters is a critical step in HJT cell prototyping.
Beyond Soldering: Lamination’s Role in HJT Module Reliability
The thermal journey of an HJT cell doesn’t end with soldering. Lamination, the stage where the module sandwich is fused together, presents another critical thermal challenge. The time and temperature profile must be perfectly tuned to cure the encapsulant without further stressing the delicate cells.
Choosing the right encapsulant and validating the process during lamination trials are just as critical for preserving the integrity of these high-performance cells.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q1: Why can’t I just use the same soldering profile I use for my PERC cells?
The fundamental structure is different. PERC cells can tolerate higher temperatures, but HJT’s amorphous silicon layers will degrade at those levels. Using a PERC profile on an HJT cell is a guaranteed way to destroy its high-efficiency potential.
Q2: What are the first signs of thermal damage in HJT cells?
Often, the initial damage is invisible. The first electrical indicator is typically a drop in the module’s open-circuit voltage (Voc). However, the only way to be certain and visualize the physical damage is through Electroluminescence (EL) testing. This process reveals microcracks long before they cause a catastrophic failure.
Q3: Does the type of solder paste matter?
Absolutely. HJT cells require specially formulated low-temperature solder pastes, typically based on a bismuth-tin (BiSn) alloy. The paste’s reflow profile—the temperature at which it melts and solidifies—must align perfectly with the narrow 165-170°C process window.
Q4: How does the number of busbars (e.g., 16BB) affect this process?
More busbars, like the 16 found in modern cells, mean the ribbons and solder pads are much thinner and smaller. This makes precise thermal control even more critical. You have to deliver enough energy to reflow every joint uniformly without concentrating too much heat in any one spot, which can easily overheat and damage the cell.
Your Next Step: From Theory to a Reliable Process
For 16BB HJT cells, manufacturing excellence is measured in single degrees. Success depends not just on using high-quality cells, but on respecting their narrow thermal limits with a tightly controlled, data-validated process centered around a 165-170°C peak reflow temperature.
Understanding this thermal budget is the first step. The next is validating it on your production line with your specific materials. As our PV Process Specialist, Patrick Thoma, often notes, „The data always tells the story. In HJT manufacturing, a few degrees separate peak performance from a hidden factory liability.“