A solar module is a promise of performance, often for 25 years or more. We see the glass, the frame, and the cells, but the true longevity of a panel often hinges on connections we can’t see: microscopic bonds holding the electrical pathways together. What happens if one of these critical bonds, thinner than a human hair, starts to fail after a decade of harsh weather?
This is not a hypothetical question. As the industry moves toward innovative designs using Electrically Conductive Adhesives (ECAs) and conductive backsheets, ensuring the mechanical reliability of these interconnections has become one of the most critical challenges in modern module manufacturing. The key isn’t just how strong a bond is on day one, but how strong it remains after thousands of days under the sun, rain, and fluctuating temperatures.
The Shift from Solder to Adhesives: A New Era of Interconnection
For decades, the standard method for connecting solar cells was soldering metal ribbons. While effective, this process involves very high temperatures (over 200°C), which can induce mechanical stress in today’s increasingly thin and fragile silicon cells.
Enter a more elegant solution: Electrically Conductive Adhesives (ECAs) paired with conductive backsheets (CBS).
- Electrically Conductive Adhesives (ECAs): Think of these as a specialized glue infused with conductive particles, like silver flakes. They create a strong, electrically stable connection at much lower curing temperatures (around 150–160°C), significantly reducing stress on the cells.
- Conductive Backsheets (CBS): This is the rear layer of the module, but with a twist. It has a pre-printed circuit of conductive material (often aluminum or copper) that the ECAs bond to, creating the module’s electrical network.
This technology is a game-changer for producing high-efficiency and shingled cell modules. But it introduces a new variable: the long-term reliability of an adhesive bond, which behaves very differently from a rigid solder joint.
Why Adhesive Strength is the New Frontier in Module Reliability
A solar module in the field is in a constant battle with the elements. Daily and seasonal temperature swings cause materials to expand and contract. Wind, snow, and humidity exert relentless physical stress.
For an ECA bond, these forces are particularly challenging. A weak or degraded bond can lead to:
- Increased Contact Resistance: As the bond weakens, the electrical connection can degrade, creating resistance that reduces power output.
- Hot Spot Formation: Poor connections can become points of high electrical resistance, generating heat that can permanently damage the cell and surrounding materials.
- Complete Circuit Failure: In the worst-case scenario, the connection breaks entirely, leading to a loss of power from an entire section of the module.
The challenge is that these failures don’t happen overnight. They are the result of slow, cumulative degradation. To build a truly durable module, we need a way to predict this degradation before the module ever leaves the factory. This is where mechanical testing comes in.
Putting Bonds to the Test: Understanding Peel and Shear Strength
To quantify the strength of an ECA bond, we rely on two fundamental mechanical tests: peel and shear. While they sound similar, they measure two distinct and equally important properties of the adhesive connection.
-
Peel Strength measures the force required to pull or „peel“ the conductive backsheet away from the cell. Imagine slowly peeling a strong piece of tape off a surface. This test is crucial for assessing the bond’s resistance to delamination, where layers begin to separate. It’s typically measured in Newtons per centimeter (N/cm).
-
Shear Strength measures the force required to make the bonded layers slide past one another. Think of trying to slide two blocks of wood apart that have been glued flat against each other. This test simulates the stresses caused by thermal expansion and contraction, where the cell and backsheet expand at slightly different rates. It’s measured in Megapascals (MPa).
A strong bond needs to excel in both areas. High peel strength prevents delamination from moisture or mechanical flexing, while high shear strength ensures the connection can withstand thousands of temperature cycles over its lifetime.
The Real Challenge: Simulating 25 Years of Wear and Tear
Measuring the strength of a freshly laminated bond is easy. The real, multi-million-dollar question is: what will that strength be after 15, 20, or 25 years in the field?
To answer this, we use accelerated aging tests to simulate decades of environmental exposure in just a few weeks or months. Two of the most important tests for adhesive bonds are Damp Heat and Thermal Cycling.
1. Damp Heat (DH) Testing
This test exposes samples to a relentlessly hot and humid environment (typically 85°C and 85% relative humidity) for 1,000 hours or more. It’s designed to simulate long-term performance in tropical or coastal climates. For ECAs, moisture is a primary enemy. It can slowly seep into the adhesive and the interface between the adhesive and the backsheet, chemically degrading the polymer and weakening the bond.
Our research consistently shows that different ECAs can perform dramatically differently under these conditions. Some may lose over 50% of their initial peel strength after 1,000 hours of damp heat, indicating a high risk of delamination in the field.
2. Thermal Cycling (TC) Testing
This test subjects samples to repeated temperature swings, often from -40°C to +85°C, for hundreds of cycles. It mimics the stress of daily temperature changes, from a cold night to a hot, sunny afternoon. Each cycle causes the interconnected materials to expand and contract. Because the solar cell, ECA, and backsheet all expand at slightly different rates (a property called the Coefficient of Thermal Expansion), this creates shear stress on the bond. Over thousands of cycles, this repeated stress can cause fatigue and lead to failure.
A Practical Guide: How Peel and Shear Tests Are Performed
While the concepts are straightforward, obtaining meaningful, repeatable data requires a precise, industrial-grade methodology.
Step 1: Industrial-Grade Sample Preparation
This is the most critical step. The test samples—typically strips of the conductive backsheet bonded to a substrate—must be prepared under the exact same conditions as a full-scale module. The quality of these test samples is paramount, as the lamination process for PV modules directly influences the initial bond strength and its uniformity. Using a lab-scale hot plate simply won’t replicate the precise pressure, temperature ramps, and vacuum levels of an industrial laminator.
Step 2: Testing with a Tensile Machine
The prepared samples are clamped into a highly precise machine called a tensile tester.
- For a peel test, the machine grips both ends of the sample and pulls them apart at a specific angle (typically 90 or 180 degrees) and a constant speed.
- For a shear test, the machine pulls the sample in opposite directions along the same plane.
The machine’s load cell records the force required to either peel the materials apart or shear the bond.
Step 3: Interpreting the Data
The machine generates a force-versus-displacement curve. In a peel test, engineers analyze the average force across the peel plateau to determine the bond strength in N/cm. For a shear test, the peak force before the bond breaks is used to calculate the strength in MPa. The real value comes from comparing the results of fresh samples to those that have undergone accelerated aging.
Expert Insights: What the Data Really Tells Us
Looking at a single number on a datasheet can be misleading. True reliability is a story told over time, through rigorous testing.
„Observing initial bond strength is only half the story,“ notes Patrick Thoma, PV Process Specialist at J.v.G. Technology. „The real insight comes from tracking the degradation curve after aging. A material that starts strong but degrades quickly under damp heat is a far greater risk than one with moderate initial strength but excellent long-term stability. This is where prototyping solar modules under controlled conditions becomes critical for predicting field performance.“
This expert perspective highlights a crucial point: context is everything. The goal isn’t just to find the strongest adhesive, but the most stable one.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What is a „good“ value for peel or shear strength?
There is no universal „good“ number. It’s highly dependent on the module’s design, the specific materials used, and the intended climate. The most important metric is strength retention. An ECA that retains 80% of its initial strength after damp heat testing is generally far superior to one that starts 20% stronger but retains only 40%.
Can I perform these tests in a standard lab?
While a university or R&D lab may have a tensile tester, the key challenge is creating industrially representative samples. The lamination cycle—including pressure, temperature uniformity, and vacuum—is incredibly difficult to replicate outside of a full-scale production environment. Results from improperly prepared samples can be misleading and lead to poor material choices.
How does the type of ECA affect the results?
The chemical makeup of the ECA (e.g., epoxy-based, silicone-based, acrylate-based) has a massive impact on its performance. Some are extremely rigid and strong but brittle, while others are more flexible and better at absorbing thermal stress but may be more susceptible to moisture. Comprehensive material testing is the only way to compare different formulations on a level playing field.
Does the backsheet surface matter?
Absolutely. The surface energy, roughness, and chemical treatment of the conductive foil on the backsheet are critical for achieving good adhesion. An ECA that bonds perfectly to one type of aluminum foil may perform poorly on another. You must test the exact combination of ECA and backsheet you intend to use in production.
From Lab Data to Long-Term Confidence
Quantitative peel and shear testing is more than just a quality control check; it’s a predictive tool essential for de-risking new module designs. By understanding how adhesive bonds behave not just on day one, but after simulated decades of aging, material suppliers and module manufacturers can make informed decisions that ensure their products live up to their 25-year promise.
Bridging the gap between a promising material datasheet and a bankable, long-lasting solar module requires moving beyond theory. It demands rigorous, repeatable testing under real industrial conditions—because in the field, reliability is everything.